Vibration engineer investigating a misleading spectral peak from an undersampled rotating machine
01 / 09

The Machine Made 900 Hz. The FFT Found 300 Hz.

A vibration signal entered an ADC at 900 Hz, but the sampled spectrum showed a convincing 300 Hz peak. The machine did not create both.

02 / 09

1. Start With the Sample Rate

The ADC takes 1,200 samples each second. Always record the sampling rate before interpreting any frequency-domain result.

03 / 09

2. Mark the Nyquist Limit

Nyquist frequency is half the sample rate. At 1,200 samples per second, the highest representable frequency is 600 Hz.

04 / 09

3. Compare the Input

The 900 Hz component sits above the 600 Hz Nyquist limit. Those samples cannot uniquely preserve its original frequency.

05 / 09

4. Calculate the Fold

Here, the alias is |900 − 1,200| = 300 Hz. The sampled points fit a slower tone even though the analog input is faster.

06 / 09

5. Reject the False Diagnosis

Do not label the 300 Hz peak a machine subharmonic yet. First prove that the acquisition chain could capture 900 Hz correctly.

07 / 09

6. Raise the Sampling Rate

The theoretical minimum is above 1,800 samples per second. Use practical margin so filtering and real hardware do not sit at the limit.

08 / 09

7. Add an Anti-Alias Filter

Band-limit the analog signal before the ADC. A higher sample rate cannot protect the measurement from unwanted out-of-band energy by itself.

09 / 09

Trust the Spectrum Only After Sampling Passes

Check the rate. Mark Nyquist. Calculate aliases. Filter first. Then decide whether a spectral peak belongs to the machine or the measurement.

Solve the Full Aliasing Case