Inspect
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
The forward gain was 10. The closed-loop output did not become 10 times the reference.
Inspect, commit, prove, fix, and sign off.
Follow the investigation process used in the field โ in five guided steps.
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
Choose your hypothesis.
Run calculations and test your idea.
Select and validate a safe correction.
See the full debrief and key takeaways.
A unity negative-feedback control loop has a constant forward-path gain G = 10. A review note says a 1.0 reference should produce an output of 10 because the controller gain is 10. In test, the output settles near 0.909. Diagnose the block-diagram error, calculate the closed-loop gain and steady-state error, and choose the change that reduces the error below 5%.
Find the root cause, confirm the fix, and see how this connects to the exam.
The output was predicted from forward gain instead of closed-loop gain.
Feedback was treated as if it did not change input-output gain.
Use T = G/(1+GH) before evaluating closed-loop response.
For unity negative feedback, the closed-loop transfer is T = G/(1+G). With G=10, T=10/11โ0.909. A unit-step input therefore produces about 0.909 output and 9.1% steady-state error.
Reduce the feedback loop before interpreting gain. For unity negative feedback, T(s)=G(s)/(1+G(s)) and E/R=1/(1+G).
10/(1+10)=10/11โ0.909.
1/(1+10)=1/11โ9.1%.
Each case is designed to build the judgment, analysis, and confidence you need for engineering exams โ and beyond.
Basic subject familiarity helps, but every case is designed to teach through the investigation itself.
Most cases are designed for a focused 5โ10 minute investigation.
Each case is mapped to a verified exam, subject, topic, and misconception before publication.
The sealed debrief unlocks with the root cause, corrected reasoning, fix, and takeaway.