The Refrigerator With a COP Greater Than One
The refrigerator removed 6 kW of heat using 2 kW of work. A COP of 3 was correct, not impossible.
Solve This Question βThe full solution unlocks after the investigation.Practice realistic FE-style engineering questions with step-by-step reasoning and detailed solutions. Choose your discipline or start solving now.
The refrigerator removed 6 kW of heat using 2 kW of work. A COP of 3 was correct, not impossible.
Solve This Question βThe full solution unlocks after the investigation.Start with a discipline, then move into focused topic practice. Empty sections stay out of search until they contain useful questions.
24 practice questions available
Practice now β FE DISCIPLINE10 practice questions available
Practice now β FE DISCIPLINE3 practice questions available
Practice now βQuestion set in development
Coming soonQuestion set in development
Coming soonQuestion set in development
Coming soonQuestion set in development
Coming soonChoose a question and solve it before reading the final engineering verdict.
The refrigerator removed 6 kW of heat using 2 kW of work. A COP of 3 was correct, not impossible.
The turbine power came from a 600 kJ/kg enthalpy drop, not from subtracting internal energies blindly.
The gas temperature rose from 300 K to 450 K. The pressure did not scale with Celsius temperature.
The flow area alone was not enough. Hydraulic radius and slope set the channel discharge.
The pipe stayed level. Velocity increased from 2 to 6 m/s, and pressure fell from 300 to 284 kPa.
The diameter fell by half. The velocity did not merely doubleβit rose from 1.5 to 6.0 m/s.
The water was motionless, but pressure still increased with depth.
The steel strength was not the first limit. Slender-column instability governed near 497 kips.
The total load was 30 kips. Multiplying by half the span produced the wrong bending moment.
The floor load was 50 psf. The beam did not carry 50 lb/ftβit carried 400 lb/ft.
Each support reaction was only 6 kN, yet each inclined top member carried about 8.49 kN.
The total load was 28 kN, but the support reactions were not 14 kN each.
A 10 kN load was shared by two cables, but each cable still carried 10 kN of tension.
Two routes matched the destination. The router chose the more specific prefix, not the visually simpler route.
Serialization took only 12 microseconds. The fiber path added another 500 microseconds.
The subnet looked large enough from the address range. The usable host count said otherwise.
Four 20 kHz channels looked like an 80 kHz jobβuntil the guard bands were counted.
The voice channel bandwidth was 4 kHz. The data link was sized at 32 kbps and immediately overflowed.
The carrier was 5 V. The message amplitude was 6 V. The envelope detector stopped reproducing the message cleanly.
Increasing gain improved responseβuntil the characteristic equation crossed the stability limit.
The low-frequency gain was 40 dB. One decade past the pole, the response was near 20 dB.
The forward gain was 10. The closed-loop output did not become 10 times the reference.
The secondary load was 8 Ξ©. The primary source did not see 8 Ξ©βor even 32 Ξ©.
The source measured 240 V. The load saw only 228 V because the feeder resistance was treated as one-way.
The load was only 30 kW, but the feeder current was much higher than the kW-only calculation predicted.
The gain equation requests -10 V, but the amplifier only has Β±5 V rails.
An NPN switch has VCC = 5 V, Rc = 100 Ξ©, Ξ² = 100, and Ib = 1 mA. Ξ²Ib predicts 100 mA, but with VCE(sat) β 0.2 V the collector circ
The reverse-polarity protection worked, but the 5 V sensor would not start.
A perfect step arrived. The filter answered 2.0 instead of 10.
A 'passband' tone reached the cutoff and lost nearly 30% of its amplitude.
The machine says 900 Hz. The sampled spectrum insists on 300 Hz.
The numerator says 20. The unit-step output settles at 5. The model is working exactly as written.
Both reactive components looked like opposition. At resonance, they canceled and the current doubled the protection limit.
The steady-state current is zero. At switch-on, the circuit violates its 5 mA startup limit.
The divider measured exactly 6 V with no load. Connect one load, and the output falls to 4 V.
Each branch looked safe. The supply still tripped the instant the second load was connected.
A 12 V source is connected across a required 2 Ξ© load. The calculated and measured current is 6 A, but the resistor overheats and fails within seconds. Identify the missing engineering check, prove the root cause, and choose a safe correction.
Fried Engineers provides FE-style practice questions organized by discipline and topic. Each interactive Case File makes you commit to an answer, test it against evidence, revise unsupported reasoning, and then review the detailed solution.
No. Unless a question is explicitly identified from an authorized source, Fried Engineers labels original material as FE-style practice rather than claiming it is an official previous-year question.
Yes. Complete the investigation to unlock the engineering verdict, corrected reasoning, and key takeaway.
Yes. Start with a discipline such as Electrical & Computer, then move into focused topic practice such as Circuit Analysis.