Inspect
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
Increasing gain improved responseβuntil the characteristic equation crossed the stability limit.
Inspect, commit, prove, fix, and sign off.
Follow the investigation process used in the field β in five guided steps.
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
Choose your hypothesis.
Run calculations and test your idea.
Select and validate a safe correction.
See the full debrief and key takeaways.
A unity negative-feedback plant has G(s)=K/[s(s+1)(s+3)]. A tuning note raises K to 20 to reduce tracking error. The closed loop then oscillates and diverges. Derive the characteristic equation, use the Routh criterion to find the stable gain range, and choose a gain that remains stable.
Find the root cause, confirm the fix, and see how this connects to the exam.
K=20 exceeded the closed-loop stability range.
More negative-feedback gain was assumed to be automatically safer.
Form the characteristic equation and verify stability before accepting gain changes.
For unity feedback with G(s)=K/[s(s+1)(s+3)], the characteristic polynomial is s^3+4s^2+3s+K. Routh-Hurwitz requires K>0 and (12-K)/4>0, so the strictly stable range is 0<K<12.
Controller gain must satisfy both performance and stability constraints. Form the closed-loop characteristic polynomial and test stability before increasing gain.
Using the Routh criterion, 0<K<12.
No. Stability must still be checked from the closed-loop characteristic equation.
Each case is designed to build the judgment, analysis, and confidence you need for engineering exams β and beyond.
Basic subject familiarity helps, but every case is designed to teach through the investigation itself.
Most cases are designed for a focused 5β10 minute investigation.
Each case is mapped to a verified exam, subject, topic, and misconception before publication.
The sealed debrief unlocks with the root cause, corrected reasoning, fix, and takeaway.