Inspect
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
A 70% cyclone followed by an 80% baghouse did not provide 150% removal. The second device treated only what escaped the first, giving 94% overall removal.
Inspect, commit, prove, fix, and sign off.
Follow the investigation process used in the field β in five guided steps.
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
Choose your hypothesis.
Run calculations and test your idea.
Select and validate a safe correction.
See the full debrief and key takeaways.
A particulate stream of 100 kg/hr enters a cyclone with 70% collection efficiency, followed by a baghouse with 80% collection efficiency based on the particulate entering the baghouse. A note adds the efficiencies and reports 150% removal. Determine the outlet particulate rate and overall collection efficiency.
Find the root cause, confirm the fix, and see how this connects to the exam.
Two collection percentages were added directly.
The baghouse receives only the particulate that escapes the cyclone.
Use Ξ·overall=1-(1-Ξ·1)(1-Ξ·2) for the stated two-stage series system.
The cyclone leaves 100(1-0.70)=30 kg/hr. The baghouse leaves 30(1-0.80)=6 kg/hr. Overall collection is 1-6/100=94%.
For independent series devices, the overall fraction remaining is the product of the stage fractions remaining: (1-Ξ·1)(1-Ξ·2).
Use Ξ·overall=1-(1-Ξ·1)(1-Ξ·2).
About 93.3%.
Each case is designed to build the judgment, analysis, and confidence you need for engineering exams β and beyond.
Basic subject familiarity helps, but every case is designed to teach through the investigation itself.
Most cases are designed for a focused 5β10 minute investigation.
Each case is mapped to a verified exam, subject, topic, and misconception before publication.
The sealed debrief unlocks with the root cause, corrected reasoning, fix, and takeaway.