← Back to Resources Resource

Comparative Evaluation of Seismic Load Effects on Tall Buildings Based on Indian Structural Codes

Explore seismic load evaluation tall buildings. Review source evidence, methods and limitations for M.Tech research.

Explore seismic load evaluation tall buildings through a published research reference related to Structural Engineering / Earthquake Engineering / Structural Retrofitting. This M.Tech resource summarizes the available source and suggests questions to validate before choosing an implementation.

Seismic load evaluation tall buildings: source and project details

Research overview

This guide deals with the dynamic seismic assessment of multistorey buildings using the Time History Method, as recorded in the indexed metadata of the 2025 study. It uses real ground‑motion records to examine key dynamic parameters: lateral displacement, velocity, acceleration, inter‑story drift, and base shear at different seismic intensities. The work follows current Indian structural codes to check the building responses. Results show larger lateral movements on the upper floors and identify zones that are especially vulnerable and need targeted retrofitting. Because only the paper’s abstract and metadata were available, the review cannot specify the modeling software used, the exact building dimensions, or the detailed code‑comparison numbers.

The resource gives M.Tech students practical guidance, modeling steps, and analysis frameworks for simulating high‑rise behavior under real earthquake excitations, helping them create code‑compliant seismic designs and retrofit plans.

Reference Paper Comparative Evaluation of Seismic Load Effects on Tall Buildings Based on Indian Structural Codes
Publication year (source record) 2025
Source document classification Research reference (type not independently verified)
Discovered via DataCite metadata
Authors (source metadata) Madhubanti Sarkar, Deep Chatterjee, Subhojit Chattaraj, Sourav Paul
Publication type (source metadata) JournalArticle
Publisher (source metadata) Zenodo
DOI (from source metadata) 10.5281/zenodo.15318824
Metadata consistency check Independent publisher/registry metadata comparison unavailable; editorial source verification required.
Evidence reviewed by generator Indexed abstract/description only; original full text, author names in PDF and methods require editorial verification.
Domain Civil Engineering
Sub-Domain Structural Engineering / Earthquake Engineering / Structural Retrofitting
Research source View Source
Get Help Get Help on WhatsApp

Message: Hi FE, I need help with “Comparative Evaluation of Seismic Load Effects on Tall Buildings Based on Indian Structural Codes” in “Civil Engineering”

Project or research direction

This is a source-backed research starting point, not a tested, ready-made student project. Any implementation requires independent feasibility, safety and results verification.

Possible tools or components to evaluate

Structural analysis software (such as ETABS, SAP2000, or ANSYS), real ground motion accelerograms, Indian Standard codes (IS 1893)

Methods or operating principles to examine

Time History Method implementation, real ground motion record integration, evaluation of lateral displacement, inter-story drift analysis, base shear calculation, identification of vulnerable upper-floor zones

Outputs to plan and verify

Comparative dynamic response plots (displacement, velocity, acceleration over time), inter-story drift profiles, base shear comparison under different seismic intensities, and identification of structural weak points for retrofitting

Further study ideas to evaluate

Comparison between Indian Standards (IS 1893) and international codes (Eurocode/ASCE); inclusion of passive energy dissipation devices (dampers/isolators) in the simulation; or machine learning-based drift prediction

Check the complete source before describing any of these as new or absent from the original work.

Suggested verification steps

  1. Read the cited paper and check which methods, parameters and results it actually reports.
  2. Define a measurable project objective and list equipment or software you can access.
  3. Validate the proposed approach independently before claiming results, working code or experimental success.

Implementation ideas above are planning suggestions, not claims that the cited researchers built or tested those exact extensions.

Explore related M.Tech project topics or browse the engineering resource library for different methods and reference papers.

Need help with this resource?

Share your academic level, branch, topic, and requirement. Fried Engineers will guide you with the right next step.

Send Requirement