Inspect
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
Three machines looked sufficient at 100% theoretical availability. At the planned 80% utilization, the cell required four machines.
Inspect, commit, prove, fix, and sign off.
Follow the investigation process used in the field β in five guided steps.
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
Choose your hypothesis.
Run calculations and test your idea.
Select and validate a safe correction.
See the full debrief and key takeaways.
A production cell must complete 270 parts per shift. Each part requires 5.0 minutes of processing on one identical machine. A shift provides 480 minutes per machine, but capacity planning limits scheduled utilization to 80%. A note divides 1350 required machine-minutes by 480 and rounds 2.81 up to three machines. Determine the required number of machines.
Find the root cause, confirm the fix, and see how this connects to the exam.
Nominal shift time was treated as fully productive capacity.
The 80% planned-utilization constraint.
Use ceil[workload/(nominal timeΓplanned utilization)].
Required workload is 270Γ5=1350 machine-min/shift. Effective capacity per machine is 480Γ0.80=384 min/shift. Therefore 1350/384=3.516, so four machines are required.
Required machines=ceil[demandΓprocessing time/(available timeΓplanned utilization)].
Divide required workload by available time multiplied by the planned utilization, then round up.
93.75%, which exceeds the stated 80% plan.
Each case is designed to build the judgment, analysis, and confidence you need for engineering exams β and beyond.
Basic subject familiarity helps, but every case is designed to teach through the investigation itself.
Most cases are designed for a focused 5β10 minute investigation.
Each case is mapped to a verified exam, subject, topic, and misconception before publication.
The sealed debrief unlocks with the root cause, corrected reasoning, fix, and takeaway.