Inspect
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
The process spread fit comfortably inside the specification width, but the mean had shifted toward the USL. Cp looked strong while Cpk exposed the centering problem.
Inspect, commit, prove, fix, and sign off.
Follow the investigation process used in the field β in five guided steps.
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
Choose your hypothesis.
Run calculations and test your idea.
Select and validate a safe correction.
See the full debrief and key takeaways.
A process has specifications 9.5 to 10.5 mm, mean ΞΌ=10.3 mm, and standard deviation Ο=0.10 mm. A quality report calculates Cp=(10.5-9.5)/(6Γ0.10)=1.67 and concludes that the process is highly capable. Determine Cp and Cpk and explain why the conclusion is incomplete.
Find the root cause, confirm the fix, and see how this connects to the exam.
A favorable Cp was treated as proof of actual centered capability.
The process mean was shifted close to the upper specification limit.
Use both Cp and Cpk; Cpk is governed by the nearest specification limit.
Cp=(10.5-9.5)/(6Γ0.10)=1.67. Cpk=min[(10.5-10.3)/(0.30),(10.3-9.5)/(0.30)]=min(0.67,2.67)=0.67.
Cp measures potential capability from spread only; Cpk also accounts for process centering by using the smaller distance from the mean to a specification limit.
Cp measures potential capability from spread; Cpk also accounts for process centering.
When the process mean is centered between the upper and lower specification limits.
Each case is designed to build the judgment, analysis, and confidence you need for engineering exams β and beyond.
Basic subject familiarity helps, but every case is designed to teach through the investigation itself.
Most cases are designed for a focused 5β10 minute investigation.
Each case is mapped to a verified exam, subject, topic, and misconception before publication.
The sealed debrief unlocks with the root cause, corrected reasoning, fix, and takeaway.