Inspect
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
The shaft power was 30 kW at 1200 rpm. That meant about 239 N·m torque, not 30 N·m.
Inspect, commit, prove, fix, and sign off.
Follow the investigation process used in the field — in five guided steps.
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
Choose your hypothesis.
Run calculations and test your idea.
Select and validate a safe correction.
See the full debrief and key takeaways.
A drive shaft transmits 30 kW at 1200 rpm. A component-selection note assumes 30 N·m torque because the power rating is 30 kW. Calculate the actual transmitted torque and determine what happens to torque if the same power is transmitted at 600 rpm.
Find the root cause, confirm the fix, and see how this connects to the exam.
The numerical power rating was mistaken for a torque value.
Power equals torque times angular speed.
Use P=Tω with consistent SI units.
Rotating mechanical power is P=Tω. At 30 kW and 1200 rpm, ω=2πN/60≈125.66 rad/s, so T≈30,000/125.66=238.7 N·m. At the same power and 600 rpm, torque doubles.
Rotating mechanical power is P=Tω, so torque depends on both power and shaft speed.
Convert rpm to angular speed with ω=2πN/60, then use T=P/ω.
Torque doubles.
Each case is designed to build the judgment, analysis, and confidence you need for engineering exams — and beyond.
Basic subject familiarity helps, but every case is designed to teach through the investigation itself.
Most cases are designed for a focused 5–10 minute investigation.
Each case is mapped to a verified exam, subject, topic, and misconception before publication.
The sealed debrief unlocks with the root cause, corrected reasoning, fix, and takeaway.