Inspect
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
A 10 wt% stream and a 40 wt% stream had to produce 25 wt% product. The concentrate flow was 100 kg/h, not 25.
Inspect, commit, prove, fix, and sign off.
Follow the investigation process used in the field β in five guided steps.
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
Choose your hypothesis.
Run calculations and test your idea.
Select and validate a safe correction.
See the full debrief and key takeaways.
A steady mixer receives 100 kg/h of a solution containing 10 wt% solute. A second stream contains 40 wt% solute. The product must contain 25 wt% solute. A quick note says the second stream can be 25 kg/h because the target composition is 25%. Determine the required second-stream flow rate and product flow.
Find the root cause, confirm the fix, and see how this connects to the exam.
Target mass fraction was mistaken for a stream flow.
Feed compositions could be averaged without flow weighting.
Use total and component material balances.
Let F2 be the 40 wt% stream. The solute balance is 0.10(100)+0.40F2=0.25(100+F2). Solving gives F2=100 kg/h, so the product flow is 200 kg/h.
Write both the total mass balance and the solute component balance; composition is flow-weighted.
Because the solute component balance requires equal feed flow rates to produce the 25 wt% midpoint composition.
Only when the contributing flow rates are equal.
Each case is designed to build the judgment, analysis, and confidence you need for engineering exams β and beyond.
Basic subject familiarity helps, but every case is designed to teach through the investigation itself.
Most cases are designed for a focused 5β10 minute investigation.
Each case is mapped to a verified exam, subject, topic, and misconception before publication.
The sealed debrief unlocks with the root cause, corrected reasoning, fix, and takeaway.