Inspect
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
The project generated 306 total trips in the PM peak hour, but only 65% were entering. The inbound design demand was about 199 veh/h.
Inspect, commit, prove, fix, and sign off.
Follow the investigation process used in the field β in five guided steps.
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
Choose your hypothesis.
Run calculations and test your idea.
Select and validate a safe correction.
See the full debrief and key takeaways.
A proposed residential development has 400 dwelling units. The planning rate is 8.5 vehicle trips per dwelling unit per day. Assume 9% of daily trips occur during the PM peak hour and the PM peak directional split is 65% entering and 35% exiting. Determine total PM peak-hour trips and entering PM peak-hour demand.
Find the root cause, confirm the fix, and see how this connects to the exam.
All peak-hour trips were assigned to one direction.
The 65% entering directional split.
Daily trips Γ peak-hour fraction Γ directional fraction.
400Γ8.5=3400 trips/day. The PM peak total is 3400Γ0.09=306 veh/h. Applying 65% entering gives 198.9β199 inbound veh/h.
Generate total trips first, apply the peak-hour fraction, then apply the directional split for the movement being designed.
Multiply daily trip generation by the peak-hour fraction and then by the directional split.
Each case is designed to build the judgment, analysis, and confidence you need for engineering exams β and beyond.
Basic subject familiarity helps, but every case is designed to teach through the investigation itself.
Most cases are designed for a focused 5β10 minute investigation.
Each case is mapped to a verified exam, subject, topic, and misconception before publication.
The sealed debrief unlocks with the root cause, corrected reasoning, fix, and takeaway.