Inspect
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
The feed was 1000 kg/h at 10 wt% solids. Concentrating to 40 wt% left only 250 kg/h liquid product.
Inspect, commit, prove, fix, and sign off.
Follow the investigation process used in the field β in five guided steps.
Review the problem, diagram, and evidence.
Choose your hypothesis.
Run calculations and test your idea.
Select and validate a safe correction.
See the full debrief and key takeaways.
An evaporator receives 1000 kg/h of solution containing 10 wt% nonvolatile solids. Water is evaporated, and the liquid product contains 40 wt% solids. Assume no solids leave with the vapor. A quick estimate says the product flow is 400 kg/h because the product is 40% solids. Determine the actual liquid-product and vapor flow rates.
Find the root cause, confirm the fix, and see how this connects to the exam.
Product composition was mistaken for a feed-flow fraction.
Only 100 kg/h of nonvolatile solids enter.
Use the solids component balance, then the overall balance.
The feed contains 100 kg/h nonvolatile solids. At 40 wt% solids, product flow is 100/0.40=250 kg/h. The remaining 750 kg/h leaves as water vapor.
For a nonvolatile solute, balance the solute first; it fixes the concentrated-product flow.
Balance the solids first, then use the overall mass balance for the vapor flow.
750 kg/h.
Each case is designed to build the judgment, analysis, and confidence you need for engineering exams β and beyond.
Basic subject familiarity helps, but every case is designed to teach through the investigation itself.
Most cases are designed for a focused 5β10 minute investigation.
Each case is mapped to a verified exam, subject, topic, and misconception before publication.
The sealed debrief unlocks with the root cause, corrected reasoning, fix, and takeaway.